But they can’t do that!

I have spent the last two weeks in Copenhagen, working with Ellen Kilsgaard on a duet performance we are going to present next week at the Connections Festival in Aarhus, Denmark. The work is called ‘DUET a Duet’ and we showed a first version of it at the Gravity&Grace festival in Limerick in November 2010.

Ellen and I had four working sessions in July 2010 and one more before the G&G performance, and while we thought we knew what we wanted to achieve and had worked out various strategies to do so, we realized that the encounter with the audience at the festival heavily impacted on the outcome of the work. Eventually we felt we only approximated what we had planned to do.

In this duet we aim to have an honest conversation with each other while exposing to the audience, in words and dance, our thinking process as the dance develops. The lack of ‘field testing’ had limited our understanding of the task at hand. For this reason we have had several people coming to witness our practice during this working period in Copenhagen. The presence of a test audience allowed us to pinpoint the issues arising when trying to maintain an open and honest relation with the viewer, and an interesting one to witness too. At times we noticed an excess of performative attitude, the conversation becoming somehow drier and even the physicality tightening up. For instance, we realized that descriptive comments, simply describing an event just happened (I crossed the space diagonally), would come out as redundant, as the audience would be perfectly able to notice that themselves, and obsolete, as the comment would arrive with a considerable delay, when the action had most likely moved on to a different stage.

Bush Hartshorn, old acquaintance the Daghdha times, came to see our rehearsal on Wednesday and suggested we would do a try-out with a non-selected audience in a more public space, such as the foyer of Dansescenen, of which he is currently the director. The gathered audience, made mainly of employers of the theatre and the Dansens Hus, seemed to genuinely enjoy the 20-minute performance, and found the piece refreshing and intelligently entertaining. A woman sitting next to Bush, somebody working in the theatre office, started saying to him “but they can’t do that, they can’t do that…” to our commenting on our own dancing, until she came to the conclusion “but off course they can! and it’s great!”.
‘DUET a Duet’ will be performed in our ‘Triple Bill’, as part of the Connections Festival in Aarhus, Denmark, on April 6th and 9th.

And now we go viral.

Daghdha Dance Company is closing down, terminated by unfortunate and ill-inspired decisions made by the Irish Arts Council. It seems appropriate for me to express my thoughts and my feelings on this blog, that so much helped my creative process during my residency at Daghdha.

It is obviously a sad moment, collectively for the loss of a creative force and of a rally point for a large community of local and international artists in such a deprived place such as Limerick city; personally for the loss of the family house and for a place where I could always seek refuge and inspiration.

Nevertheless, the ethos of Daghdha, the ideas and the legacy will carry on through the work of the people that have been influenced by its sprit and energy; people, such as myself, who have had their work and their lives deeply reshaped by such a place. Now we take Daghdha to the world, we go viral and spread everywhere we can. I have seen this happening before, with the quiet executions of the European Dance Development Center in Arnhem or the slow degeneration of the School for New Dance Development in Amsterdam. The ideas live on and eventually resurface in a different time and space.

I am currently in Copenhagen working with another former Daghdha Mentoring Program (DMP) participant, Ellen Kilsgaard. Yesterday, Ellen and I had the fantastic opportunity to show a preview of our duet to a small audience in the foyer of Dansescenen, the most importance dance theatre in Denmark. Former DMP coordinator Bush Hartsorn, currently artistic director at Dansescenen set up this opportunity for us, gathering the staff of the theatre and of the adjacent Dansens Hus. It was a true Daghdha moment, spontaneous, fresh and provocative.

On Saturday the 26th, a good-bye event will take place in Daghdha Space, John Square, Limerick: the Ponderous Counter-spectacle of Things Ceasing to Be. We go out with a bang and then we keep banging all over the map.

Something Possibly Entertaining

“Something possibly entertaining” is a user-friendly, self-explanatory and straightforward piece of dance, some would even say axiomatic. It is dance made comprehensible to the ordinary person. It’s unfussy, unpretentious and uncomplicated, yet educational and illuminating. It will demystify and make fun of dance, at the same time revealing how uniquely remarkable it actually is. Plus it will be possibly entertaining.

A solo by Giorgio Convertito
approx. 10 min.
Daghda Space, 10, 11, 18.09.2010

Work in progress (This is Later)

A solo by Giorgio Convertito)
approx. 48 min.
Daghdha Space, 14.9.2010

“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later.” — Cormac McCarthy (The Road)

My body is sailing in the gap moment where movement is just about to begin or just about to end, suspended in that instant just before something happens or just after something has occurred. This focus seems to take us to a place in between places, a moment in between moments, a silent, uneventful, yet compelling place.

In my research I have located that place within the body, the connective tissue, which is the tissue that connects one body system with another, for example the muscles to the bones.

“When we move in the space in between the organs, bones, muscles, blood vessels, or cells, we are moving through the connective tissue sheaths. This movement is sensual, internal, flowing and elastic (…). It flows on and on, rebounds, and flows on again. It gives vital support to the integrity of the whole in both movement and stillness.” – Linda Hartley (Wisdom of the Body Moving).

Certain aspects of this piece of work can be discovered only in the presence of an audience and that is why at the moment it is called a work in progress.

My most appreciative thanks go to the Daghdha Dance Company staff and the fellow DMP artists in residence

The practice.

At Daghdha we have recently initiated a series of conversations between the artists in residence. This week topic was the individual practice and how that practice translates to performance.

In the traditional kind of dance education, skills and abilities are mainly acquired by means of repetition: tasks and maneuvers are repeated again and again until proficiency is achieved. In this context a daily practice becomes the fundamental instrument to maintain and improve one’s strength, flexibility and stamina. Personally I come from a somatic education background, where the emphasis is on experiential learning, focussing on learning from within rather than from imitation of an outside model. Somatic refers to the ability to sense a process “within you” and education still intends to increase your ability to function.

In this context, the practice is a constant refinement of awareness, perception, observation, appreciation, all necessary to keep the practice itself going: I don’t practice in order to get better, I practice because the practice is what I do. Naturally practice and performance end up coinciding: the practice is the performance, the performance is the practice.

Another solo.

Another short solo has come out of my practice here at Daghdha. It’s somehow more instinctive and less conceptual than the first one, stemming from a stream of consciousness instead. I have been introducing words and sentences in my usual dance practice, trying to apply the same kind of process to the text as I do to the movement: awareness, observation, appreciation and the inevitable choices that become apparent. During that practice I found a couple of gripping elements which I decide to use as pillars for the construction of the solo. This choice led to a somehow structured composition and left me wondering if I “closed” it too soon.

The question is whether to throw all the elements back in the air and see where they fall next, or accept the result of the process as it is and move on to the next effort, with the heartening knowledge that the practice can support and stimulate a fruitful creative process.

A step closer.

“Being possessed by (…) timelessness, spacelessness, forgetfulness (…) is permanent and total satisfaction of our desire” – Mark Patrick Hederman, Manikon Eros.

In a couple of my previous posts I mentioned how I try to become transparent when I make a dance, to become a vessel for the dance to unfold. It is not a case of relinquishing control of the dance, stepping into another state of consciousness or do just whatever comes. It is rather reaching a heightened state of awareness to get to a place where whatever choice is the best possible choice.

I feel as all the time spent in studying and teaching the notions and compositional skills concerning time and space in dance has finally landed me in a place where time and space don’t matter anymore. Or rather these are no longer external elements to be controlled or manipulated to reach a certain objective of excellence. Therefore timelessness as when there is no fast or slow, but only being in time, being in the moment; spacelessness as when everything becomes part of the dance, all spaces are included; forgetfulness as surrendering of the ego and letting the self be placed right “on top” of what I am doing.

For a while now, I have come to realize that I dance because it is the only way to access a certain kind of knowledge. To put it simply, when I dance I know something I don’t know when I don’t dance. Perhaps one step close to achieving “total satisfaction of desire”.

Suspended in the in-between moment.

“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later.” — Cormac McCarthy (The Road)

When last month I presented a short work in progress to my fellow artists in residence for a feedback session, the work was described as dystopian. Most agreed they saw that element as focalizing in the “narrative” of the piece.

From Wikipedia: A dystopia (from the Ancient Greek δυσ-: bad-, ill- and τόπος: place, landscape) is a vision of an often futuristic society, which has developed into a negative version of Utopia. A dystopia is often characterized by an authoritarian or totalitarian form of government. It often features different kinds of repressive social control systems, a lack or total absence of individual freedoms and expressions and a state of constant warfare or violence.

As much as this aspect intrigued me, I couldn’t immediately quite recognize it as part of what I was doing. Under recommendation I picked up “The Road” by Cormac McCarthy and read it in a couple of days. The novel describes a post-apocalyptic world in which all matter of wildlife is practically extinct and the human race is slowly starving to death. The past is irremediably gone, the future is a dark hopeless place and the present is a timeless moment in between nothing. Wasn’t that what I was after, what I saw in those Hopper paintings? Something crucial has just happened and we find ourselves suspended in that “in between” moment. Except I didn’t quite see the desperation of that moment.

I went back to Hopper and to little surprise discovered that in many of his paintings he used linear perspective to draw the eye, not just into a third dimension, but into a region of darkness and implied fear. Pictures like “Approaching a City” or “Automat” are clear examples: the dark tunnel into which the railroad is leading us; the two rows of light reflected in the back window in “Automat”, leading into a vanishing point in the darkness; the only one way out a staircase leading downward. Despair is evident.

Has she? Will she? Should she? Now that she has, what next?


“Approaching a City”


“Automat”

Stepping into the unknown.

I reckon it’s always been about that. When I look back at the first steps in my dance career, during my Amsterdam days, that theme was already a central topic. I remember describing the feeling on stepping into the unknown, with the metaphor of being on a ship, when you can’t see anymore the shore from where you sailed off, and not yet the port of call, the in-between part of the journey (one could argue that is all a journey is about).
After all the years I am again dealing with the desire, or rather the necessity to question and re-examine all I know. The residence at Daghdha is become all about questioning and re-examining my dance, the reason itself for which I dance, re-evaluating my skills and knowledge, disputing the role of the dancer and the responsibility of choreography.

All of this is not surprisingly manifesting in the work that is starting to emerge and in the practice I am currently involved. I find myself in this in-between place, my body sailing in the gap moment when movement is just about to begin or just about to end.

Moving little.

Possibly for the first time in my life I seem to be needing a long and attentive warm-up in order to do what I’m trying to do. Ironically I am moving very little, at least apparently, as my focus is on tiny minute movements and shifts in the body, the small dance as it’s been called sometime. Is it maybe that I need an extra “effort” to stay true to the listening when the information is so little, when the voice is so quiet? Or perhaps it’s the groin pain that has been bothering me for a couple of weeks, but then injuries are sometime our best teachers. At any rate I seem to need to get my body warm in a different way that I have been doing in the past and if I don’t my attention is inadequate and I notice something imitational about the way I move. Is perhaps “moving little” physically more challenging than “moving a lot”?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.